Although there may be some slight room for improvement before this article reaches, 'e.g.', WP:FA level, I think what we see right now is absolutely at least at GA level. Done Full review GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)Ī (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): This article is very well written. I look forward to conducting the full review soon. It seems to provide complete coverage and is also well-sourced. Although this is merely my first take, and while I may find some areas for improvement, I am very impressed with the quality of this article. My initial impression is that this article is likely to be deemed GA quality in its current state. There has been no prior GA review which presents any issues which have been left unresolved.īased on these conclusions, this article is entitled to a full review.There is not any edit-warring taking place on this article.The article is not in need of any cleanup banners.I've conducted a copyvio check and found nothing warranting further examination. The article does not contain any copyright violations.If the article isn't already there (and my full review might very well reveal that it is), it's certainly close. The article is clearly not a long way from meeting any of the six good article criteria.I've begun the process of conducting this article's GA review and I've made a few initial findings w/r/t the WP:GAFAIL factors: The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. This review is transcluded from Talk:Kumbalangi Nights/GA1.
0 kommentar(er)
